Top Ten Reasons Tom Quirk is Mr. Whalen’s Boy

First of all, allow me to say that I did not write this entry.  I literally copied and pasted.  I’m not sure who wrote it, so if it’s you, please let me know and I’ll gladly give you the credit.

TEN: Tom’s Finance Chair is a partner in a lobbying firm hired by Whalen.

NINE: Tom’s signs are placed on Whalen Properties

EIGHT: This cycle, Whalen gave $41,000 to Jim Smith who gave all of it to the Baltimore County Victory Slate of which Tom’s a part.

SEVEN: This cycle, Whalen gave $17,500 to Kevin Kamenetz who flipped $10,000 of it to the Baltimore County West Democratic Slate (BCWDC) helping Tom win much of the minority vote.

SIX: Emmett Burns received $6,000 from Whalen this cycle.  His people electioneered for Tom again helping him win much of the minority vote.

FIVE: Mr. Whalen’s wife visited Tom during primary voting at Woodbridge Valley, when her precinct was Catonsville High.  Why?

FOUR: Delores Kelly and Adrienne Jones who appear on the BCWDC all take money from Whalen.

THREE: Jones, Nathan-Pulliam, and Burns who co-sponsored HB1161, or the Promenade Bill as it was called by Annapolis Staffers all assisted Tom either in electioneering and/or are on the  BCWDC

TWO: Tom’s 2007 Letter to the editor stating that “Mr. Whalen is a good man” and “Catonsville needs the Promenade” along with his relationship at the Chamber of Commerce who relentlessly lobby for Whalen’s beloved Promenade.

The number ONE reason Tom Quirk is MR WHALEN”S BOY: When Whalen addresses people who he believes are friendly to Quirk, he says, “How’s my boy doing?”

Advertisements

The Un-Truth Truth Squad Strikes Again

At a debate on Saturday afternoon, in a beautiful backyard on Forest Drive, in Catonsville, two candidates came to the table to debate the issues most vital to the first district.  Unfortunately I didn’t get the stay the entire time.  Surely something must have changed from the time I left until the end, because according to Quirk’s Facebook page, he won the debate.  Interesting how he went from flat out lying to winning.  I’m pretty sure this win was all in his head though.

Since I can’t recount the entire debate, allow me divulge just a few hard facts.

The candidates started out talking about why they entered the race.  Quirk’s answer surprised me a bit.  It seems he just up and decided to run one day when the going got tough for the rest of us.  I’m sure it had nothing to do with any political aspirations he’s had since he moved into the area 8 years ago.  You know that four years ago he ran for the Democratic Central Committee and lost, right?  Funny how most of his “resume” was built in the years since his last loss.  But that must just be a coincidence.

My second and last point lies within a, well, lie.  He said that 84% of his contributions came from individuals.  “I encourage everyone to go the Maryland Campaign Finance website and look it up for yourself.”  Okay, Tom, that’s just what we did.   You know what we found?  Seems Tom needs to retake some math classes, because it turns out 48% of his donors are businesses, 75% of them donated on one evening back in late ’09 at a $1,000 a plate fundraiser hosted by Quirk’s “fundraising chairperson,” David Gildea, a development lawyer from Towson.

When asked the question about his top 5 contributors and how they would affect his candidacy, Tom skirted the question, immediately on the defensive.  Why?  What does he really have to hide?

Here are his top 5 donors?

1. Elizabeth Parham, $4,000, individual, donated on 11/19/09 (the same night at the Smith/Gildea fundraiser.  Can’t really find out much about her from Google, but it begs the question: Why was she at a fundraiser to which developers and their allies were invited?

2. Thomas Morris, $2,000, individual, also donated on 11/19/09.  Thomas Morris owns Thomas D Morris Inc, a company out of Reistertown (note: not in our district) that supplies “large domestic animals-cattle, sheep, swine, and goats (other species by request)-that have been bred specifically for research needs.”

3. Macro Holdings Property Development, $2,000, business entity, also donated on 11/19/09.  Macro Holdings is a  company based out of Ellicotty City (again out of district), who happens to develop and finance Sonic Restaurants through out Maryland.

4. Sibel Enterprises, $2000, business entity, also donated on 11/19/09.  Can’t find much information about this company as well, but I do know that they are also based out of district in Owings Mills, and they’ve given money to Kamenetz and O’Malley as well.  Gee, no strings attached there, right?

5. Gwynn Mill Joint Venture llc, $2000, business entity, also donated on 11/19/09.  Again it’s a bit of an allusive company, and I thought Google was so thorough.  Regardless, I’m seeing a pattern here in that they’re also not in our district.

Funny how Tom didn’t mention a single one of these donors at the debate the other day, not a single one.  All 5 gave on the same night, at the same place.  All 5 have contributed to other Democrat’s campaigns around the state.  All 5 are outside of our district.

In case you think I’m picking an choosing to make it look worse than it is.  There were 5 contributors at the $2,000 level, all of which were given on 11/19/09.  The next lowest from from The Friends of Jim Smith at $1,500.

Maybe Tom has access to a different site than the rest of us, one where 84% of his contributions comes from individuals from his community.  He mentioned Dimitris and One Mile West as some of his top contributors.  I can’t find Dimitris on his report anywhere and One Mile West contributed $500…not exactly at the top.

I challenge each of you to do exactly what Mr. Quirk told you to do…go look it up for yourself.

Jim Smith, Tarzan of the Concrete Jungle and his Lackeys

According to Jim Smith, Baltimore County is the portrait child of fiscal responsibility.  He claims to protect open space, as does his proteges Kevin Kamenetz and Tom Quirk.  But is that really the truth?  Is Baltimore County both fiscally responsible and environmentally conscious?

For starters, riddle me this.  If you’re so concerned with open spaces Mr. Smith, then why is it that Baltimore County falls well below the state recommendations of 30 acres of open space per 1,000 people.  Here we’re looking at 19 acres and dropping.   Now I realize that just because you have a “D” beside your name, you’re automatically given the environmentalist stamp of approval.  I remember when I was working the polls for Bush in ’04, one of the Kerry supporters asked me what my major was in college.  When I responded “outdoor education,” the guy literally flipped his lid.  “How can you stand over there and support a party that seeks to destroy the Earth?”  Overreact much?  My husband and I actually consider ourselves conservative to the core, and we’re not just talking about politics.  Environmentally, I would consider myself a mild but realistic tree hugger.  I don’t buy into global warming as a human-induced end to the world as we know it, but I do think that we must be good stewards for what we have been entrusted with, this great and vast planet and all that surrounds it.

So when I see people like Smith, Kamenetz, and Quirk receiving rubber stamps of approval from environmental groups without even a second glance at their actual record, I shudder.  It’s the same reason I shuddered yesterday when I watched Quirk introduce himself as the democratic candidate only to African-American voters.   Why can’t voters look at the person instead of the party?

Smith is responsible for the brick pavement (AKA more concrete and a huge waster of tax payer dollars) in front of the old courthouse in Towson.  He’s also a huge supporter of the Promenade.  Everybody is entitled to their own opinions, and I’m not going to come out and bash Whalen or his plans.  But here’s where you have to follow the money.  In the last 4 years, Whalen alone has donated over $50,000 to Jim Smith’s campaign from both him personally and his myriad of LLCs.  This doesn’t even touch the surface when it comes to donations from the development community.  Why do you think companies like Whalen’s would give such a hefty amount to a politician if it’s not to pull strings?

Smith’s son, Michael,  is a development lawyer in Towson who has been working hard to raise money from his friends and colleagues for a select few lackeys in the County Council races.  Him and his bud, Gildea, has raised over $35,000 for Quirk alone, most of which originated from a $1,000-a-plate fundraiser back in late ’09, and all of which came from developers and their allies.   Back when Bryan Sears first broke the story, I wrote a blog in response.  Tom Quirk was so bent out of shape over the whole situations that he unfriended me from Facebook, as if I had twisted his arm to take the money then stabbed him in the back by criticizing his actions.

Speaking of Quirk, he’s running around touting how great things are in Baltimore County, how responsible we are with our money, how fabulous our schools are, and how he’s so interested in protecting open spaces.  Yet he’s endorsed by Smith, a man who is eternally fused to the developers and their money.  Even when he’s out of office, he’ll still maintain his marionetting rights to those indebted to him for his great “generosity” and connections.  Quirk told a friend of mine before the primary, a Democrat who is now supporting Steve, “You should support me, because I’m the one who is wired and connected.”  But he’s not a puppet, right?

As the GCCC Candidate Forum a couple weeks back, Tom told the crowd that this election wasn’t about party affiliation, then a couple minutes later said he was “looking forward to working with all the Democrats” in Towson.  Sounds a bit contradictory to me.

This is why it’s so incredibly important that we elect the right people, cut the strings, and give Baltimore County a breath of fresh air.  It’s more critical than ever to make sure Ken Holt and Steve Whisler, along with David Marks, Todd Huff, David Nawrocki, and Jon Herbst get on the Council or at least four of them. We have to make sure their is balance and accountability.

85% of the councilman’s job is to deal with zoning and development issues.  Don’t you think a fiscally responsible government would include a fair and balanced process that allows communities a seat at the table with an actual say in what happens?  Don’t you think a fiscally responsible government would include granting contracts to companies that bid and win, instead of buddies and contributors of the peeps in power?  Don’t you think a fiscally responsible government would seek to revitalize existing concrete jungles instead of carving away at our open spaces in order to appease their donors?

If you’re content with more of the same, then by all means, vote for Kamenetz and Quirk, but if you’re ready for actually accountability and responsibility, then it cast your ballot for Ken Holt and Steve Whisler, even if you’re a Democrat or the party-formally-known-as-Independent.  Maybe this is the day you cross the boundary line to vote for a person and not a party.

Quirk’s Un-Truth Squad

On Quirk’s website he has a section entitled “The Truth Squad” which is interesting because as you read through it, most of his “truths” are unsubstantiated at best and untrue at worst.  Just because you say something is not true does not make you a true myth buster.  i don’t have time to unravel every point, though I’m sure this will not be the last you’ll hear from me on this topic.

Quirk Untruth #1:

MYTH:  Baltimore County has a $144 million budget deficit

Baltimore County is required by law to have a balanced budget every year.  It does not have, and has never had, a budget deficit.

Really, Tom?  It’s never had a deficit?  I beg to differ.  In December the County Auditor reported a $138 million budget deficit.  By February, that shortfall had risen to $144 million. By May, when the budget was voted through, the deficit had reached $160 million. See, we don’t just pull facts out of our butts.   Now Quirk is right about one thing, it is the law that the budget is balanced come June.  So the Councilmen and County Executive were forced to make up for the downfall.  On May 27, they passed their 2011 budget, and they were kind enough to not raise our property tax rates or furlough county employees.  Why would they do that?  It’s an election year.  That would have been political suicide.  Why do you think they passed that ridiculous excuse for a pensi on reform bill?

A couple notes about the current budget:

  • Saw the smallest cuts in over 20 years, only $200,000 (compared to $900,000 – $1.6 million range in previous years)
  • “In times of recession, it is not a choice to be fiscally responsible,” say Olszewski.  Seriously? So being fiscally responsible is a choice otherwise?
  • “Many departments, which were forced to cut their budgets in this fiscal year to eliminate a $160 million deficit, saw their budgets further reduced for next year,” says Bryan Sears in his article.
  • “If the economy does not improve, they must be prepared to cope with the effects of economic factors and decisions outside their control,” says Olszewski of the councilmen who will take office in January.  Basically newbies, be prepared when the band-aid falls off.

The Un-Truth Squad will return.  Don’t you worry your pretty little head.